|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 93-102
Production of podophyllotoxin from roots and plantlets of Hyptis suaveolens cultivated in vitro
Rafael A Velóz1, Alexandre Cardoso-Taketa2, María Luisa Villarreal2
1 Faculty of Pharmacy. Autonomous University of the State of Morelos.Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa. Cuernavaca Morelos, CP 62209, Mexico
2 Biotechnology Research Center. Autonomous University of the State of Morelos. Av. Universidad 1001. Col. Chamilpa. Cuernavaca, Morelos , CP 62209, Mexico
|Date of Submission||25-Jul-2012|
|Date of Decision||16-Aug-2012|
|Date of Web Publication||15-Apr-2013|
María Luisa Villarreal
Biotechnology Research Center, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos. Av. Universidad 1001. Col. Chamilpa. Cuernavaca, Morelos, CP 62209
Source of Support: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología México (grant 80980),, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Hyptis suaveolens was an important source of food and medicines in pre-hispanic Mιxico and is actually used popularly to treat respiratory and skin diseases, fever, pain, and cramps, between other ailments. In 2008 the presence of podophyllotoxin (PTOX) was reported in this plant. Objective: To establish in vitro cultures of H. suaveolens able to produce PTOX. Materials and Methods: Explants of H. suaveolens were cultivated in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with different concentrations of the phytohormones 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BAP), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and kinetin (Kin), in order to induce the production of podophyllotoxin. Root cultures without hormones were also established and the quantification of PTOX was performed by HPLC analysis. Results: The presence of growth regulators during in vitro cultivation of H. suaveolens, provoked morphological variations in explants, and induced the accumulation of different levels of PTOX. Roots grown without phytohormones accumulated PTOX at 0.013% dry weight (DW), while in three of the callus cultures cell lines growing together with roots, PTOX accumulated at concentrations of 0.003, 0.005 and 0.006% DW when NAA was combined with either Kin or BAP. In wild plant material PTOX was present in trace amounts in the aerial parts, while in the roots it was found at 0.005% DW. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that although it is possible to obtain PTOX in a variety of in vitro cultures of H. suaveolens, in vitro roots grown without the addition of growth regulators were better producers of PTOX.
Keywords: Hyptis suaveolens , in vitro cultures, podophyllotoxin
|How to cite this article:|
Velóz RA, Cardoso-Taketa A, Villarreal ML. Production of podophyllotoxin from roots and plantlets of Hyptis suaveolens cultivated in vitro. Phcog Res 2013;5:93-102
|How to cite this URL:|
Velóz RA, Cardoso-Taketa A, Villarreal ML. Production of podophyllotoxin from roots and plantlets of Hyptis suaveolens cultivated in vitro. Phcog Res [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Jun 25];5:93-102. Available from: http://www.phcogres.com/text.asp?2013/5/2/93/110538
| Introduction|| |
Podophyllotoxin (PTOX) is a 2,-7'-cyclolignan that posses antiviral and cytotoxic properties,  and is used topically in the treatment of genital warts (Condyloma acuminata) caused by the human papilloma virus.  Synthetic derivatives of PTOX (etoposide, teniposide and etopofos), which are currently commercialized, are actually used as efficient anticancer drugs.  Other synthetic derivatives from PTOX have been developed for treatment of certain cancers, as well as for rheumatoid arthritis.  Even tough, the synthesis of 2,-7'-cyclolignans has been established; it turns out to be costly and therefore economically unviable.  Actually, PTOX is extracted from the plant material of the species Podophyllum peltatum and Podophyllum emodi, which are now categorized as endangered species, and whose in vitro propagation has as yet proven to be complicated.  The development of the drugs etoposide, teniposide, and etopofos, have increased the demand for PTOX, both to carry out the synthesis of such derivatives, and also for research purposes.  Among investigated new natural sources that accumulate PTOX are included the plant species Linum album,  Callitris drummondii,  Jeffersonian chinensis,  Linum scabellrum, and Hyptis suaveolens  used in this investigation.
The establishment of cell cultures (roots and cell suspensions); through biotechnological procedures have been investigated in some species expecting to favor the production of PTOX.  Experiments to enhance the production of PTOX have included medium optimization,  permeabilization,  addition of precursors and elicitors;  as well as the immobilization of cells and also the addition of phytohormones,  as in this study.
However as of yet, the production of PTOX by biotechnological procedures, hasn't proven to be a good commercial alternative, due to the constant genetic spontaneous variation of the plant cells, and the high costs of production. 
The presence of PTOX in the plant species H. suaveolens has been reported in both aerial parts and in roots  H. suaveolens, ("Chan" or "Chia de Colima") was an important source of food and medicine in pre-hispanic Mexico.  Nowadays H. suaveolens is used traditionally for the treatment of respiratory diseases, fever, skin diseases, pain, and cramps.  It has also been reported that essential oils extracted from the leaves of this plant, exhibit antifungal,  antimicrobial,  anticonvulsant,  antiplasmodial,  anti-inflammatory  and antinociceptive  activities.
It is important to seek new alternatives for obtaining PTOX in quantities economically exploitable. This project, based on previous screening studies indicating H. suaveolens as a possible source of PTOX,  is designed to use biotechnological tools such as in vitro propagation, tissue culture and callus formation, in search of future sustainable and rational exploitation of this plant species. Herein we report the effect of different phytohormone combinations on the production of PTOX using in vitro cultivation.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. (Lamiaceae) aerial parts, roots, and seeds were collected near Mérida Yucatαn, and authenticated by German Carnevalli from the CICY's Herbarium. The assigned voucher number is 7086 (CICY).
The medium used was Murashige and Skoog (MS)  enriched with 0.1 g/L of myo-inositol (Sigma Chem. Co), 30 g/L of sucrose, and 1.5 g/L of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Sigma-Aldrich Chem. Co). The pH was adjusted to 5.7, and 1.5 g/L of phytagel (Sigma-Aldrich Chem. Co) was added; then autoclaved for 15 minutes at 121°C for sterilization.
One hundred seeds obtained from adult specimens were selected and sterilized by a process of immersion in a solution of ethanol at 70% for 10 minutes, followed by 3 immersions in sodium hypochlorite at 5, 10 and 15% for 3, 10, and 3 minutes, respectively. After each immersion, the seeds were rinsed with distilled sterilized water, and equally distributed in 10 jars using an enriched MS medium. The cultures were kept at 25 °C in a cultivation room with a photoperiod of 16 hours.
in vitro propagation
After germination, and once the plantlets have reached a size of approximately 5 cm and developed roots, they were sub-cultured into separate vials and allowed to grow until they reached a length of 8 cm. Explants of lateral branches when extending at 2-3 cm from the stem apical meristem, were then taken for multiplication. MS-enriched medium was used as described before.
in vitro cultivation of roots
The roots produced by plantlets were separated and sub-cultured in enriched MS liquid medium without phytohormones. Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL) with 150 mL liquid medium were inoculated with roots (10 g) each. The medium was changed every 7 days. The flasks were maintained at 25°C in a cultivation room with no light and with agitation at 60 rpm on an orbital shaker.
in vitro cultivation of Hyptis suaveolens explants
As above, explants of lateral branches when extended 2-3 cm long were taken. They were maintained at 25°C in a cultivation room with a photoperiod of 16 hours. Thirty different treatments resulting from the combination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) at 0, 0.2, 1 and 2 mg/mL and kinetin (Kin) at 0, 0.06, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL or 6-benzylamino purine (6-BAP) at 0, 0.06, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL, were added to the medium. In other series of experiments, 30 treatments resulting from the combination of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) at 0, 0.4, 1 and 2 mg/mL with Kin at 0, 0.06, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL or 6-BAP at 0, 0.06, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL were incorporated [Table 1]. All the hormones were purchased from Sigma Chem Co. The 15 explants used for each of the different combinations of phytohormones were harvested at 5 weeks. Phytohormones and the concentrations used were chosen through an exhaustive bibliographic review.
|Table 1: Different combinations of phytohormones used for the in vitro cultivation of Hyptis suaveolens|
Click here to view
Plantlets and roots obtained in vitro were dried by lyophilization. The wild plant was air dried. Subsequently the dried plant material was pulverized and macerated with 100% chloroform for 6 days. The extracts were filtered to remove plant material. The solvent was separated from the extracts by distillation under reduced pressure, using a rotary evaporator at a temperature of 35°C. Once evaporated, all samples were re-suspended in methanol for HPLC analysis.
Identification and quantification of PTOX
The instrumentation used for HPLC-DAD analysis consisted of a Waters (Millipore Corp., Waters Chromatography Division, Milford, Ma.) 600E multisolvent delivery system equipped with a Waters W996 diode array detector (232 nm). Control of the equipment, data acquisition, processing, and management of chromatographic information were performed by Millenium 32 software program (Waters). The analytical HPLC separations were done on a Symmetric C 18 column (Waters; 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) with an isocratic elution of acetonitrile: water with 0.2% acetic acid (40:60), a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and a sample injection of 20 μL (1 mg/mL).
For quantification, we established a calibration curve using a standard commercial PTOX from Sigma Chem. Co. (98%) under the conditions described above. We started with an initial concentration of 1 mg/mL of PTOX in methanol, and 7 dilutions were made. For the identification of PTOX in the extracts, some dilutions were prepared at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL for extract of plantlets and roots obtained in vitro, respectively. In addition, UV-visible spectra were obtained, and co-elutions were made, in which a solution was prepared with 100 μL of sample solution plus 500 μL of the extract, further analyzed by HPLC. For the wild plant material, PTOX in aerial parts and roots was quantified. For roots grown in vitro 3 replicates were prepared. For plantlets, callus and roots subjected to hormonal treatments, 3 replicates were prepared.
A one way analysis of variance was conducted (ANOVA), and for comparison with the control, the Dunnett test was used. For the quantification of PTOX in the different extracts, 3 repetitions were done.
| Results|| |
Roots grown in vitro
From cultures grown in solid agar media without phytohormones, five sets of 10 g of roots each, were separated and sub-cultured in liquid MS medium for five weeks. Roots were brown, flexible and thin [Figure 1], and showed a 36.7 percentage of growth at the end of the culture period (35 days), in comparison with inoculum. At 35 days in culture mean fresh weight was of 15.8 ± 1.054 g, reduced to 2.1037 ± 0.3957 g of dry plant material.
|Figure 1: Roots of Hyptis suaveolens grown in vitro at 35 days in culture|
Click here to view
Effect of phytohormones in plant growth and morphology
After one week of placing the seeds in agar, the percentage of germination was 40%. Two months later, one of the plantlets was selected for subcultivation, and thereby reduced the effects of biological variability on ongoing experiments. This plantlet was propagated in order to obtain 200 plantlets with roots, from which 900 explants were obtained and subjected to hormonal evaluation. For all the experiments in which 2,4-D was added as an auxin, combined either with Kin or 6-BAP, the tissue was phenolized, and died during the first week of cultivation. When NAA was added as an auxin, different results were obtained [Table 2]. Those treatments with the highest concentration of NAA (2 mg/mL) combined with any concentration of either Kin or 6-BAP (Numbers 3, 7, 11, 15, 18, 22, 26 and 30), exhibited high phenolization during the first week and finally died. Also the treatments with low NAA (0.4 and 1 mg/mL) but high 6-BAP (0.5 mg/mL) (No. 27, 28 and 29) were phenolized. In some treatments additioned with NAA at 0.4 and 1mg/mL combined either with Kin (at 0.06, 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL) or 6-BAP (at 0.06 and 0.2 mg/mL), the explants showed protuberances within one week in culture, and after 13 days, callus appeared with three variations [Figure 2] [Table 2]: 1) development of callus and roots (treatments 5, 9 and 13) [Figure 2]a, [Table 2], 2) development of shoots with roots and callus presence (treatments 6, 10 and 14) [Figure 2]b 3), presence of callus and shoots but defoliation during the first week (treatment 20, 21, 24 and 25) [Figure 2]c.
|Figure 2: Variations for callus production after 35 days in culture. (a) Treatment 13 (NAA 0.4 mg/mL and Kin 0.5 mg/mL). (b) Treatment 10 (NAA 1 mg/mL and Kin 0. 2 mg/mL). (c) Treatment 24 (NAA 0.4 mg/mL and 6-BAP 0.2 mg/mlL)|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Some common physiological characteristics observed for Hyptis suaveolens cultures supplemented with phytohormones|
Click here to view
For those hormonal combinations that contained only NAA at 0.4 (treatment 1 [Figure 3] and treatment 16), or NAA at 1.0 mg/mL (treatments 2. and 17) white and vigorous roots appeared starting in the second week and reaching big biomasses at 35 days in culture.
|Figure 3: Treatment 1 (0.4 mg/mL of NAA) with roots development, after 35 days in culture|
Click here to view
It is noteworthy that treatments with cytokinines (Kin or BAP) in the absence of NAA (treatments 4, 8, 12, 19 and 23), showed no root development but exhibited presence of new shoots [Figure 4].
|Figure 4: Treatment 8 (Kin 0.2 mg/mL), no roots were formed, and new shoots appeared|
Click here to view
Identification and quantification of PTOX in wild plants
To quantify PTOX, we constructed an HPLC calibration curve, where T R (retention time) of PTOX was equal to 13 ± 0.06 min. (r =1).
In the wild plant material, aerial parts showed the presence of PTOX in traces, which were not quantified because it was outside the limits of quantification. Wild roots showed a signal with a T R = 13 ± 0.015 min. in concentration of 0.05 ± 0.0011mg PTOX /g DPM (mg PTOX per g of dry plant material) with a positive co-elution, in addition, UV spectrum obtained for this extract was similar to PTOX [Figure 5], which confirmed the presence of the compound.
|Figure 5: HPLC-DAD chromatograms and UV spectra of extracts from wild roots of H. suaveolens. (a) PTOX, TR = 13 ± 0.06 min. (b) wild roots, TR = 13 ± 0.015 min. equal to PTOX suggesting the presence of the compound. (c) Co-elution of wild roots extract and PTOX, TR = 13 min, where there is an increase AUC (Area under the curve) proportional to the amount of the added PTOX. UV spectra obtained from wild roots and PTOX standard were similar|
Click here to view
Identification and quantification of PTOX in cultures
Roots grown in vitro
The presence of PTOX in in vitro roots grown without phytohormones was detected by HPLC, where a signal was obtained with a T R = 13 ± 0.04 min, and confirmed for a positive co-elution, in addition, UV spectrum obtained for PTOX was similar in this extract [Figure 6]. The concentration of PTOX in these extracts was 0.12 ± 0.015 mg PTOX /g DPM , corresponding to 0.013% DW PTOX. Roots did not excrete PTOX into the medium.
|Figure 6: HPLC-DAD chromatogram and UV spectra of in vitro roots without hormones. (a) PTOX, TR = 13 ± 0.06 min. (b) roots grown in vitro showing a signal with a TR = 13 ± 0.04 min. (c) co-elution of in vitro root extract plus PTOX, TR = 13 min, where there is an increase in AUC proportional to the amount of added PTOX. UV spectra obtained from cultivated roots and PTOX standard were similar|
Click here to view
Identification and quantification of PTOX in in vitro plantlets and calluses obtained through phytohormonal combinations
From 30 hormonal combinations, only three (treatments 6, 9 and 20) showed the presence of PTOX [Figure 7] at concentrations of 0.042 ± 0.0005, 0.018 ± 0.004 and 0.049 ± 0.0005 mg PTOX /g DPM respectively, while in other three (treatments 5, 13 and 25) only traces of PTOX were observed.
|Figure 7: Chromatograms obtained by HPLC-DAD and UV spectra showing the presence of PTOX. (a) PTOX, TR = 13 ± 0.06 min. (b) treatment 20, which shows a signal with a TR = 13 ± 0.01 min. (c) treatment 9 , which shows a signal with a TR = 13 ± 0.032 min. (d) treatment 6 , which shows a signal with aTR = 13 ± 0.02 min. These signals are equal to the signal PTOX, suggesting the presence of the compound. UV spectra obtained from treatments 6, 9 and 20, and PTOX standard were similar|
Click here to view
To corroborate the identity of PTOX, UV spectra and co-elutions were performed for treatments 6, 9, 20 [Figure 8], which confirmed the presence of the compound.
|Figure 8: Chromatograms obtained by HPLC-DAD and UV spectrums showing the presence of PTOX. (a) chromatogram of PTOX, TR = 13 ± 0.06 min. (b) chromatogram obtained by co-elution of treatment 6 and PTOX TR = 13. (c) chromatogram obtained by co-elution of treatment 9 and PTOX, TR = 12.9 min. (d) chromatogram obtained by co-elution of 20 and PTOX, TR = 12.9 min. UV spectra from co-elutions were similar to the one from PTOX|
Click here to view
For the accumulation of PTOX and according to statistical analysis, there is no significant difference between wild plants and treatments 6 and 20; however a difference is shown between wild plants and treatment 9 (P < 0.05). On the other hand, a significant difference was observed between in vitro cultivated roots without hormones, and those of wild roots or those explants subjected to hormonal treatments (P < 0.05) [Figure 9].
|Figure 9: PTOX concentration in the analyzed different extracts. Experiments with (*) indicate significant differences compared to extracts from wild roots according to the analysis of variance that was performed via Dunnett sample (P < 0.01). n = 3|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The presence of PTOX in the wild roots of H. suaveolens was confirmed and these results are consistent with those previously obtained by Lautié,  who reported accumulation of PTOX in the roots of this plant using the β-glucosidase extraction procedure. , In the present study PTOX content in the wild roots was 0.05 ± 0.0011 mg PTOX /g DPM (0.005%) and for in vitro root extracts, PTOX was equal to 0.12 ± 0.015 mg PTOX /g DPM (0.13%). In other roots PTOX has been reported to occur in Juniperus sabina and J. squanata at a concentration of 0.06 and 0.09 mg PTOX /g DPM respectively, , values similar to the one obtained for wild roots, but lower to that for the in vitro roots in our study. Other studies on the accumulation of PTOX in wild plant material include L. album (0.0005% FW of PTOX);  P. peltanum and H. verticillata (0.25% DW in both cases); and P. emondi wild plant material (4.3 to 5.2% DW).  Some reports indicate that roots in culture are good producers of PTOX, for example in L. album in vitro roots, PTOX is accumulated at 1.5% of DW,  while in reports of callus cultures, PTOX accumulated at a concentration that varies from 0.018 to 0.78% DW. ,, In our study, treatments 6, 9 and 20 that accumulated PTOX exhibited the presence of calluses growing together with roots.
Kadkade in 1982  observed that callus cultures of P. peltatum increased the accumulation of PTOX from 0.0094% to 0.065%, when they were cultivated in media enriched with NAA and 2,4-D; and when they were grown in a combination of 2,4-D and Kin, an increase of 0.57% production of PTOX was obtained. Farkya and Bisaria in 2008  reported that in L. album root cultures without phytohormones PTOX was obtained at 6.20 mg PTOX /g DW , when Kin, NAA or 2,4-D were added separately the production of PTOX increased to 6.6, 8.9, and 12.5 mg PTOX /g DW respectively; but when NAA was added together with Kin or 2,4-D together with Kin, the production of PTOX decreased to 5.89 and 2.26 mg PTOX g DW , respectively. Furthermore Smollny et al.,  reported that in cells suspension cultures of L. album grown in MS medium supplemented with NAA, the PTOX production increased by 0.5% compared to control cultivation. In the study done by Heyenga et al.  with cultures of P. hexadrum, the presence of 2,4-D did not promote the production of PTOX.
Results obtained in the present study indicate that in those treatments in which 2,4-D was added, the tissue was phenolized and died during the first week of cultivation. However when NAA was the only phytohormone added, no presence of PTOX was detected, while in some treatments where NAA was combined with Kin or 6-BAP (treatments 6, 9 and 20) PTOX was detected at a similar level as in wild roots.
According to the results obtained in this project, the extracts of roots, treatments 6 (NAA 1 mg/mL and Kin 0.06 mg/mL) and 20 (NAA 0.4 g/mL and 6-BAP 0.06 mg/mL), had a PTOX content by dry weight of 0.004 and 0.005% respectively, accumulating PTOX at a level similar to that obtained for J. chinensis 0.005%.  However, treatment 9 (NAA 0.4 mg/mL and Kin 0.2 mg/mL) produced just 0.002% of PTOX dry weight, or half of the amount produced with treatments 6 and 20. Notably the accumulation of PTOX in roots grown in vitro without hormones was 0.12 ± 0.015 mg PTOX /g DPM , corresponding to 0.013% DW PTOX, a concentration 2.6 times higher than that accumulated for treatments 6 and 20.
Plant material in tissue culture that was supplemented with phytohormones, showed no statistically significant increase in the production of PTOX, but nevertheless did show an increase in production of PTOX compared to the control (in vitro plants without phytohormones). On the contrary, in our study it was notable that those in vitro roots rather than wild roots were the better producers of PTOX, and that the presence of exogenous hormones is not critical for its accumulation. Though as yet not studied, there is the possibility that endogenous hormones in the in vitro roots of this plant that were grown in the dark, are activated to become adequate inducers for increased accumulation of PTOX.
| Conclusion|| |
Hyptis suaveolens is a Mexican plant species that accumulates podophyllotoxin in aerial parts as well as in roots of wild specimens. This is the first report on the use of in vitro tissue culture techniques applied to H. suaveolensH. suaveolens in order to induce plant genotypes able to express the accumulation of PTOX. Our investigation established that by the use of growth regulators, it was possible to obtain in vitro cultures, provoke morphological variations in explants, and establish callus and root lines of Hyptis suaveolens. It was also proved that three of the cultures of calluses growing together with roots cultivated in the presence of phytohormones, were able to accumulate PTOX at similar concentrations as wild roots, indicating that the metabolic pathway for this type of compounds is actively expressed in the in vitro obtained material. A new aspect in this study is the observation that root cultures without the addition of phytohormones produced higher levels of PTOX compared to wild plants that were collected in a specific location of México.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología México (grant 80980). Rafael A. Veloz gratefully acknowledges a research fellowship awarded by CONACY to carry out PhD studies at UAEM.
| References|| |
|1.||Tian X, Liu YQ, Yang L. Podophyllotoxin: Current Perspectives. Curr Bioact Compd 2007;3:37-66. |
|2.||Kaplan IW. Codylomata acuminata. The New Orleans Med Surg J 1942;94:388-90. |
|3.||Lautié E, Fliniaux MA, Villarreal ML. Updated biotechnological approaches developed for 2,7'-cyclolignan production. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2010;55:139-53. |
|4.||Gordaliza M, García PA, del Corral JM, Castro MA, Gómez-Zurita MA. Podophyllotoxin: Distribution, sources, applications and new cytotoxic derivatives. Toxicon 2004;44:441-59. |
|5.||Wu Y, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Chen J, Li L. A new and efficient strategy for the synthesis of podophyllotoxin and its analogues. Organ Lett 2007;9:1199-202. |
|6.||Lautié E, Quintero R, Fliniaux MA, Villarreal ML. Selection methodology with scoring system: Application to Mexican plants producing podophyllotoxin related lignans. J Ethnopharm 2008;120:402-12. |
|7.||Farkya S, Bisaria VS, Srivastava AK. Biotechnological aspects of the production of the anticancer drug podophyllotoxin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004;65:504-19. |
|8.||Wichers HJ, Versluis de Haan GG, Marsman JW, Harkes MP. Podophyllotoxin related lignans in plants and cell cultures of Linum flavum. Phytochemistry 1991;30: 3601-04. |
|9.||Van Uden W, Pras N, Malingre TM. The accumulation of podophyllotoxin-β-D-glucoside by cell suspension cultures derived from the conifer Callitris drummondii. Plant Cell Rep 1990;9:257-60. |
|10.||Muranaka T, Miyata M, Kazutaka I, Tachibana S. Production of podophyllotoxin in Juniperus chinensis callus cultures treated with oligosaccharides and a biogenetic precursor. Phytochemistry 1998;49:491-6. |
|11.||Chattopadhyay S, Srivastava AK, Bhojwani SS, Bisaria VS. Production of podophyllotoxin by plant cell cultures of Podophyllum hexandrum in bioreactor. J Biosci Bioeng 2002;93: 215-20. |
|12.||Van Uden W, Pras N, Malingre TM. On the improvement of the podophyllotoxin production by phenylpropanoid precursor feeding to cell cultures of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 1990;23:217-24. |
|13.||Schmitt J, Petersen M. Influence of methyl jasmonate and coniferyl alcohol on pinoresinol and matairesinol accumulation in a Forsythia intermedia suspension culture. Plant Cell Rep 2002;20:885-90. |
|14.||Hernández F. Historia Natural de la Nueva España. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1959. |
|15.||Chukwujekwu JC, Smith P, Coombesc PH, Mulholland DA, van Staden J. Antiplasmodial diterpenoid from the leaves of Hyptis suaveolens. J Ethnopharm 2005;102:295-7. |
|16.||Malele RS, Mutayabarwa CK, Mwangi JW, Thoithi GN, Lopez AG, Lucini EI, et al. Essential oil of Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. from Tanzania: composition and antifungal activity. J Essent Oil Res 2003;15:438-40. |
|17.||Asekun OT, Ekundayo O, Adeniyi BA. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Hyptis suaveolens leaves. Fitoterapia 1999;70:440-2. |
|18.||Akah PA, Nwambie AI. Nigerian plants with anticonvulsant properties. Fitoterapia 1993;64:42-4. |
|19.||Grassi P, Urías Reyes TS, Sosa S, Tubaro A, Hofer O, Zitterl-Eglseer K. Anti-inflammatory activity of two diterpenes of Hyptis suaveolens from El Salvador. ZNaturforsch. 2006;C61:165-70. |
|20.||Santos TC, Marques MS, Menezes IA, Dias KS, Silva AB, Mello IC, et al. Antinociceptive effect and acute toxicity of the Hyptis suaveolens leaves aqueous extract on mice. Fitoterapia 2007;78:333-6. |
|21.||Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962;15:475-9. |
|22.||Empt U, Alferman AW, Pras N, Petersen M. The use of plant cell cultures for the production of podophyllotoxin and related lignans. J Appl Botany 2000;74:145-50. |
|23.||Kartal M, Konuklugil B, Indrayanto G, Alfermann AW. Comparison of different extraction methods for the determination of podophyllotoxin and 6-methoxypodophyllotoxin in Linum species. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2004;35:441-7. |
|24.||San Feliciano A, Del Corral JM, Gordaliza M, Castro MA. Acetylated lignans from Juniperus sabinai. Phytochemistry 1989;28:659-60. |
|25.||Bedir E, Khan I, Moraes RM. Bioprospecting for podophyllotoxin. In: J Janick, A Whipkey, editors. Trends in new crops and new uses. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press; 2002. p. 545-9. |
|26.||Broomhead AJ, Dewick PM. Aryltetralin lignans from Linum flavum and Linum capitatum. Phytochemistry 1990;29:3839-44. |
|27.||Farkya S, Bisaria VS. Exogenous phytohormones affecting morphology and biosynthetic potential of hairy root line (LYR2i) of Linum album. J Biosci Bioeng 2008;105:140-6. |
|28.||Heyenga AG, Lucas JA, Dewick PM. Production of tumour-inhibitory lignans in callus cultures of Podophyllum hexandrum. Plant Cell Rep 1990;9:382-5. |
|29.||Giri A, Giri CC, Dhingra V, Narasu ML. Enhanced podophyllotoxin production from Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed cultures of Podophyllum hexandrum. Nat Prod Lett 2001;15:229-35. |
|30.||Ahmad R, Sharma VK, Rai AK, Shivananda RD, Shivananda BG. Production of lignans in callus culture of Podophyllum hexandrum. Trop J Pharma Res 2007;6:803-8. |
|31.||Kadkade PG. Growth and podophyllotoxin production in callus tissues of Podophyllum peltatum. Plant Sci Lett 1982;25:107-15. |
|32.||Smollny T, Wichers H, Kalenberg S, Shahsavari A, Petersen M, Alfermann AW. Accumulation of podophyllotoxin and related lignans in cell suspension cultures of Linum album. Phytochemistry 1998;48:975-9. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Effect of plant growth regulators, light intensity and LED on growth and volatile compound of Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit in vitro plantlets
| ||H.B. Andrade,A.F. Braga,S.K.V. Bertolucci,B.S. Hsie,S.T. Silva,J.E.B.P. Pinto |
| ||Acta Horticulturae. 2017; (1155): 277 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Biotechnological interventions for harnessing podophyllotoxin from plant and fungal species: current status, challenges, and opportunities for its commercialization
| ||Anita Kumari,Dharam Singh,Sanjay Kumar |
| ||Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2016; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|