|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 38-42
Effects of Ephedrine and Ephedra fragilis Crude Extracts on Human Peripheral Lymphocytes
E Attard1, K Vella2
1 Institute of Agriculture, University of Malta, Msida, Malta MSD 2080, Malta
2 Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta, MSD2080, Malta
|Date of Submission||02-Feb-2009|
|Date of Acceptance||20-Feb-2009|
|Date of Web Publication||2-Jan-2010|
Institute of Agriculture, University of Malta, Msida, Malta MSD 2080
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Ephedra fragilis Desf. (Ephedraceae), a locally cultivated medicinal plant, is a source of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, two important alkaloids, which have long played an important pharmacological role. The present study investigated the in vitro effects of ephedrine and the Ephedra branch extract on unstimulated lymphocytes. Ephedra alkaloids were extracted from various plant parts and after phytochemical analysis, the brine shrimp lethality test was used to determine the activity of the extracts. The LC 50 of the branch extract was 581.395 μg/ml, showing no statistical difference from that of ephedrine (208.203 μg/ml). The ephedrine and extract did not show toxic effects on lymphocytes but exhibited immunostimulant activity. Although ephedrine cannot be used as an immune booster, it can be used as a lead drug for further immunological research.
Keywords: Ephedra fragilis, ephedrine, lymphocyte activation, cell proliferation, cytotoxicity
|How to cite this article:|
Attard E, Vella K. Effects of Ephedrine and Ephedra fragilis Crude Extracts on Human Peripheral Lymphocytes. Phcog Res 2009;1:38-42
|How to cite this URL:|
Attard E, Vella K. Effects of Ephedrine and Ephedra fragilis Crude Extracts on Human Peripheral Lymphocytes. Phcog Res [serial online] 2009 [cited 2021 Jan 27];1:38-42. Available from: http://www.phcogres.com/text.asp?2009/1/2/38/58130
| Introduction|| |
Ephedra fragilis Desf. (Gnetopsida, Mormon tea, Ma Huang) is a native of the Asian countries and possesses several medicinal virtues. These include alleviation of sweating, lung and bronchial constriction, alleviation of water retention, and in the treatment of inflammation, headache, and fever , . This plant contains alkaloids  , amino acids, and proteins  , tannins, fatty acids  , volatile oil, flavonoids, minerals, and vitamins. Amongst the alkaloid group, ephedrine is one of the principle alkaloids found in this plant species  .
Clinically, Ephedrine has bronchodilator and vasoconstrictor effects, which are beneficial in the control of asthma and nasal congestion. It has diuretic properties, enhances uterine contractions, and has anti-inflammatory effects. In combination with caffeine, it has thermogenic effects, which are important for the treatment of obesity  . However, its use has been associated with several side effects such as tachycardia, hypertension, headache, insomnia, anxiety, palpitations, dizziness, and toxic psychoses  .
Few studies show the in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory activity of alkaloids and related compounds. Earlier studies , have shown that Amaryllidaceae alkaloids, ambelline and 1,2-β-epoxyambelline, possess immunostimulatory activity. Colchicine, a phenylakylamine alkaloid, possesses immunostimulatory activity at very low doses  . The immunostimulant compound levamisole , is not an alkaloid but its activity has been associated with endogenous opiate alkaloids which are implied in immunostimulatory activities  . Other phytochemical classes have been investigated in greater depth in this respect ,,, . We report here that other phenylalkylamine alkaloids (including ephedrine) possess a stimulatory rather than a cytotoxic effect on peripheral lymphocytes.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Different aerial parts [Table 1] were collected in May 2003, from local cultivated Ephedra fragilis specimen on the University grounds. The plant was identified by the botanist, at the Institute of Agriculture, University of Malta where a voucher specimen is deposited. The aerial parts were separated as branches, dried pods, seeds, fresh pods including seeds, and flowers. The material was then oven dried at 30°C for 48 h, pulverized and dispersed in distilled water for 25 min. Each plant material was stirred for 30 min at 30°C, allowed to stand for 15 min and stirred for another 30 min. A filtrate was obtained under reduced pressure and then treated with sodium carbonate (15 g). The solution was stirred for a further 15 min and then mixed with an equal volume of benzene. The benzene solution was then treated with acidified distilled water (2%, HCl) and the aqueous extract was neutralised to a pH of 7. The precipitate was obtained by centrifugation (Hermle, Germany) and oven-dried at 32°C.
The dried extracts were then analysed qualitatively and quantitatively with thin-layer chromatography (Silica gel 60F 254 ; water, acetic acid and butanol [5: 1: 4]) and UV spectrophotometry (Pharmacia LKB-Ultraspec Plus) employing standard ephedrine (Sigma) at a reference wavelength of 317 nm [Table 1]. The primary bioactivity of the extracts was monitored by the brine shrimp lethality test (BST)  . The median lethal concentrations (LC 50 ) of the respective treatments were obtained.
Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated from heparinised peripheral blood of healthy human male volunteers using Histopaque®-1077 (Sigma, USA). The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15% foetal calf serum, antibiotics and free from PHA (a mitogen known to stimulate cell division of T-lymphocytes) at a concentration of 2.4 x 10 6 cells/ml and distributed in 96-well plates as stated below. The cultures were treated with: (a) ephedrine standard to final concentrations ranging from (69-0.69 μg/ml); (b) PHA, m-form (Gibco BRL, UK) to final concentrations ranging from 1-0.01%; (c) Ephedra branch extract to final concentrations ranging from 69 0.69 μg/ml (ephedrine content).
The cultures were assayed, at the specified time intervals and in triplicates, for total and viable cell counts, drug cytotoxicity and morphological characteristics. Total and viable cell counts were conducted according to the methods described by Freshney  . Cytotoxicity was estimated using the tetrazolium LDH cytotoxicity assay (Boehringer- Mannheim, Germany) and spectrophotometric measurement of dye absorbance obtained at 492/650 nm in an ELISA reader  . Cell suspensions treated with 100 μl Triton X-100 were used as 'high' controls, while the untreated cultures were used as 'low' controls. Cytotoxicity was estimated at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Morphological characteristics were observed in lymphocytes stained with Eosin Azure 50 (EA 50) as adopted from the Papanicolau method  .
Numerical data was analyzed using the BMDP/DYNAMIC (v 7.0) (Cork, Ireland) statistical package for one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Bonferroni post-hoc test for comparison of means with the control, one-way analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) and two-tailed adjusted means T-test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value <0.05.
| Results and Discussion|| |
The different aerial parts of E. fragilis yielded different quantities of Ephedra alkaloids as illustrate in [Table 1]. Although branches yielded the lowest percentage of alkaloids (0.0547%), compared to the other aerial parts (> 0.1389%, p<0.05), the branch extract was used due a higher material availability. Asian Ephedra contains between 0.5 and 2.5%  . This is slightly higher than that obtained with the locally cultivated species. In the brine shrimp test, the Ephedra branch extract showed a low LC 50 [Table 2], comparable to that of Ephedrine (581.395 and 208.203 μg/ml, respectively, p>0.05). The fact that the LC 50 is below 1000 μg/ml  indicates that the Ephedra branch extract exhibited activity.
The total counts over the 96 h culturing period [Figure 1] show that ephedrine and the Ephedra extract resulted in an increase in cell population as compared to the control. As a matter of fact the viability of the three treatments was very high over the 96-hour period (96.945 ± 0.477, 97.445 ± 0.279, and 97.621 ± 0.217%, for PHA, Ephedrine and Ephedra extract respectively). The control showed a slightly higher viability (97.726 ± 0.368%) although not significantly different from the rest. In many instances, the unstimulated cells are protected from apoptosis and so there is the possibility that cells remain viable without being affected by this programmed-cell death ,, . However, proliferation tends to occur even when no stimuli are present. This was observed in this investigation as even the untreated control showed an exponential increase in total counts. The low release of lactate dehydrogenase enzyme from treated and control cells correlate well with the viability results [Table 2]. This reflects a considerable consistency between the two assays carried out. Morphological results [Figure 2] reveal that for cells treated with PHA, Ephedrine and Ephedra extract, no qualitative differences and no evidence of apoptosis was observed. The control cells measured 6-10 μm  , while treated cells measured 20-40 μm.
Ephedrine, like the catecholamines, has both direct and indirect adrenergic activity  . However, catecholamines have a selected affinity towards one type of adrenergic receptor. For example, phenylephrine has a preferential α-adrenergic activity while norepinephrine and epinephrine possess higher β-adrenergic activity affinity. In vitro, β-adrenergic agonists tend to inhibit stimulated cells, including lymphocytes, while α-adrenergic agonists do not inhibit this activity  . However, β-agonists have been shown to exhibit a stimulatory response on lymphocytes only in an in vivo system, involving a spleen-dependent process  . Ephedrine differs from ephinephrine and phenylephrine as it lacks the two catechol hydroxyl groups which are responsible for α and b-adrenoceptor affinity. The N-substituted moiety and the β-hydroxyl moiety are particularly important for β-adrenergic activity  . A distinguishing characteristic is that ephedrine has more activity at α-adrenoceptors rather than pseudoephedrine, and the opposite towards β-adrenoceptors. This suggests that the stereo-arrangement of the β-hydroxyl moiety is critical. As a matter of fact it can be concluded that owing to the fact that ephedrine is the most predominant alkaloid in the Ephedra branch extract and direct lymphocyte activation in vitro is mainly due to α-adrenoceptor activity, it leads to the conclusion that the Ephedra branch extract, more particularly ephedrine, exhibit a potent direct effect on lymphocytes in vitro. In spite of this, the stimulation of a T-lymphocyte subset could be of importance in tumour immunology ,, . This has been suggested for other plant metabolites, such as Amaryllidaceae alkaloids, extracted from Crinum latifolium L. , and Cucurbitaceae terpenoids, extracted from Ecballium elaterium (L.) A. Rich (Cucurbitaceae)  . Although in vivo, Ephedra (Ma Huang) has shown to cause mild myocyte hypertrophy and infiltration with lymphocytes, associated with ephedrine  , its main constituent may be used as a lead compound for further immunomodulatory research.
| References|| |
|1.||E.L. Chan, T.M. Ahmed, M. Wang and J.C. Chan. History of medicine and nephrology in Asia. Am J Neph. 14: 295-301 (1994). |
|2.||M. Ling, S.J. Piddlesden and B.P. Morgan. A component of the medicinal herb Ephedra blocks activation in the classical and alternative pathways of complement. Clin Exp Immunol. 102:582-588 (1995). |
|3.||B.T. Schaneberg, S. Crockett, E. Bedir and I.A. Khan. The role of chemical fingerprinting, application to Ephedra. Phytochem. 62: 911-918 (2003). |
|4.||A.L. Oliver, B.N. Anderson and F.A. Roddick. Factors effecting the production of L-phenylacetylcarbinol by yeast, a case study.Adv Microb Physiol. 41: 1-45 (1999). |
|5.||R.L. Wolff, W.W. Christie, F. Pedrono, A.M. Marpeau, N. Tsevegsόren, K. Aitzetmόller and F.D. Gunstone, Delta 5-olfenic acids in the seed lipids from four Ephedra species and their distribution between the alpha and beta positions of triacylglycerols. Characteristics common to coniferophytes and cycadophytes. Lipids. 34: 855-864 (1999). |
|6.||K.J. Kemper. Seven herbs every pediatrician should know. Contemp Ped. 13: 79-93 (1996). |
|7.||E. Wooltorton and B. Sibbald. Ephedra/ephedrine, cardiovascular and CNS effects. J Canad Med Ass. 166: 633 (2002). |
|8.||S. Ghosal, K. Saini and V. Arora. 1,2-_-epoxyambelline an immunostimulant alkaloid from Crinum latifolium. J Chem Res. 7: 232-233 (1984). |
|9.||S. Ghosal. Natural occurrence of 11-O-acetylambelline and 11- O-acetyl-1,2-_-epoxyambelline in Crinum latifolium, immunoregulant alkaloids. Pharm Res. 5: 251-252 (1985). |
|10.||H. Wagner. Search for plant derived natural products with immunostimulatory activity (recent advances). Pure Appl Chem. 62: 1217-1222 (1990). |
|11.||J.L. Marx. Cancer immunotherapy, Focus on the drug levamisole. Science. 191: 57(1976). |
|12.||G.S. Del Giacco, S. Tognella, A.L. Leone, F. Locci, P. Cornaglia, A. Sangiuolo and V. Grifoni. Interference of levamisole with inhibition of E. Rosette formation by Hodgkins disease and systemic lupus erythematosis cytotoxic sera. Blood. 53: 1002-1007 (1979). |
|13.||S. Spector, I. Munjal and D.E. Schmidt. Effects of the immunostimulant, levamisole, on opiate withdrawal and levels of endogenous opiate alkaloids and monoamine neurotransmitters in rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 19: 417-27 (1998). |
|14.||J. Liu, S. Wang, J. Qi, X. Wang and Y. Song. The immune stimulatory effect of bio-active peptide from pollen on murine and human lymphocytes. Mech Aging Dev. 104: 125-132 (1998). |
|15.||E. Attard, M.P. Brincat and A. Cuschieri Immunomodulatory activity of cucurbitacin E isolated from Ecballium elaterium. Fitoterapia. 76: 439-441 (2005). |
|16.||M. Sonel and G. Kuttan. Immunomodulatory and antitumour activities of Tinospora cordifolia. Fitoterapia. 70, 35-43 (1999). |
|17.||Mangion Randon and E. Attard. The in vitro immunomodulatory activity of oleuropein, a secoiridoid glycoside from Olea europaea L. Nat Prod Comm. 2: 515-519 (2007). |
|18.||J.L. McLaughlin, C.J. Chang and D.L. Smith. Bench-top bioassays for the discovery of bioactive natural products, An update. Stud Nat Prod Chem. 9: 383-409 (1991). |
|19.||R.I. Freshney, Culture of Animal Cells, A Manual of Basic Technique, (Alan R Liss, New York, 1988) 132-134. |
|20.||T. Decker and N.L. Lohmann-Matthes. A quick and simple method for the quantitation of lactate dehydrogenase release in measurements of cellular cytotoxicity and tumor necrosing factor (TNF) activity. J Immunol Methods. 15: 61-69 (1988). |
|21.||M.E. Boon and J.S. Drijver, Routine Cytological Staining Techniques (Macmillan Education Ltd, New York, 1986) 1-238. |
|22.||Alkofahi, R. Batshoun, W. Owais and N. Najib. Biological activity of some Jordanian medicinal plant extracts. Part II. Fitoterapia. 67: 163-168 (1997). |
|23.||G.A. Rabinovich, N.M. Modesti, L.F. Castagna, C.A. Landa, C.M. Riera and C.E. Sotomayor. Specific inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation and induction of apoptosis by CLL-I, a beta-galactoside-binding lectin. J Biochem. (Tokyo). 122: 365-373 (1997). |
|24.||C.E. Perandones, V.A. Illera, D. Peckham, L.L. Stunz and R.F. Ashman. Regulation of apoptosis in vitro in mature murine spleen T cells. J Immunol. 151: 3521-3529 (1993). |
|25.||S. Wesselborg, O. Janssen and D. KabelitzInduction of activation-driven death (apoptosis) in activated but not resting peripheral T-lymphocytes. J Immunol. 150: 4338-4345 (1993). |
|26.||D. Male, J. Brostoff, D.B. Roth and I. Roitt, Immunology (Mosby, London, 2006) 30. |
|27.||R.B. Rothman, N. Vu, J.S. Partilla, B.L. Roth, S.J. Hufeisen, B.A. Compton-Toth, J. Birkes, R. Young and R.A. Glennon. In vitro characterization of ephedrine-related stereoisomers at biogenic amine transporters and the receptorome reveals actions as noreponephrine transporter substrates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 307: 138-145 (2003). |
|28.||J.M. Cook-Mills, R.L. Cohen, R.L. Perlman and D.A. Chambers. Inhibition of lymphocyte activation by catecholamines, Evidence for a non-classical mechanism of catecholamine action. Immunol. 85: 544-549 (1995). |
|29.||L.J.H. Van Tits, A. Daul, H.J. Bauch, H. Grosse-Wilde, M. Happel, M.C. Michel and O.E. Brodde. Effects of insulininduced hypoglycemia on beta 2-adrenoceptor density and proliferative responses of human lymphocytes. JCEM. 71: 187- 192 (1990). |
|30.||R.R. Ruffolo, W. Bondinell and J.P. Hieble. α- and b- Adrenoceptors, From the gene to the Clinic. 2. Structureactivity relationships and therapeutic applications. J Med Chem. 38: 3681-3716 (1995). |
|31.||E. Zvetkova, G. Kostov and A.I. Hadjioloff. Sur la cytochimie des leucocytes chez les cancereux et les precancereux. Archives de l'Union Medicale Balkanique. 140-142 (1984). |
|32.||E. Zvetkova, S. Koshucharoff and A.I. Hadjioloff. Cytochemistry of nucleoproteins (RNP and DNP) and some cationic proteins in the peripheral blood leucocytes of patients with lung cancer. Folia Haematol. 106: 205- 223 (1979). |
|33.||E. Zvetkova, R. Toshkova, V. Ralchevsky, A. Dikov, E. Katzarova, I. Chowdhury and I. Yanchev. Protective effect of ranopterin neopterin on experimentally induced Graffi tumours in hamsters. Pteridines. 9: 196-200 (1998). |
|34.||E. Attard, A. Scicluna-Spiteri, A. Cuschieri and M.P. Brincat. The effects of cucurbitacin E on two lymphocyte models. Pharm Biol.. 42: 170-175 (2004). |
|35.||S.M. Zaacks, L. Klein, C.D. Tan, E.R. Rodriguez and J.B. Leikin. Hypersensitivity myocarditis associated with Ephedrause. Clin Toxicol. 37: 485-489 (1999). |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]